Newsom Criticizes SAVE Act, Warns U.S. Could ‘Lose This Country’

 

California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the SAVE America Act this week, warning the proposal could harm the country. Newsom has previously accused President Donald Trump of behaving like a dictator while also positioning himself for a potential presidential run.

The governor’s latest comments focused on the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections.

Supporters of the measure argue the law would ensure that only American citizens participate in federal elections. Newsom said the proposal is about determining who can vote, which is actually true.

Advertisement

“What’s the SAVE Act? That’s not about ID, it’s about registration,” Newsom said. “It’s about who gets to vote, who doesn’t get to vote. They are not screwing around. We will lose this country.”

Republicans have argued the measure is necessary to prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections. Democrats have largely opposed the proposal. Recent polling shows that large majorities of Republican, Democratic, and Independent voters support requiring an ID to vote.

The debate over voter eligibility and election security has become a major issue heading into the next federal election cycle.

Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. John Fetterman broke with Democratic Party leadership in February, signaling his support for voter identification laws, saying he does not view showing ID to vote as unreasonable.

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and almost all Senate Democrats have turned down the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. This bill, which would protect the integrity of elections, passed the House earlier this week.

Schumer has called the bill “Jim Crow 2.0” because he thinks it would keep people from voting instead of making elections safer. But Fetterman, who has repeatedly disagreed with his party’s messages and positions, pushed back against Schumer’s framing of the bill.

“I would never refer to the SAVE Act as like Jim Crow 2.0 or some kind of mass conspiracy. But that’s part of the debate